In this unlikely COVID-19 survivor’s case, there are more questions than answers
Six months in, it is clear that mortality is not the only outcome that matters.
I scan through my patient’s record, four months of life distilled into a series of progress notes, lab values and radiology, until I find what I am looking for – a chest X-ray from May.
It is a striking image, the kind of X-ray that should not have been compatible with life.
Yet, here I am, preparing to see the patient in our critical illness recovery clinic. Though we started this clinic long before the pandemic, it now offers us an opportunity to see our sickest coronavirus patients after they leave the hospital and return home.
Understanding that many of them might not otherwise have access to the sub-specialty and psychiatric care that will help them recover, we screen for common post-intensive care issues and check labs and lung function to better understand the course of recovery after coronavirus.
But this clinic serves another purpose as well. Here, in Boston, months past the peak of the pandemic, we are in a strange sort of limbo.
Time dilates. I read through old patient notes and autopsy reports, replay decisions, wonder what we would do differently if – and when – this happens again.
No matter how much I try, I might never be able to make sense of it all. But perhaps seeing my patients again on different terms can help me begin to understand the long shadow of the pandemic, and to move forward.
I enter the small clinic room. My patient is sitting on the exam table with his teenage son by his side. As we greet each other from across the room, I cannot help but marvel for a moment at the simple fact that we are all here.
That he is alive and walking and talking and breathing under his own power. I meet his son’s eyes and wonder if he, too, is thinking about that day in May.
It was about a week before the chest X-ray. We were on rounds when the nurses called us to his room, yelling through the closed door.
From outside the room, I took in the bright red blood in the vent tubing and suction canister, oxygen saturation wavering.
We moved quickly to stabilise him while one of the resident doctors called his family to come in. It would be the first time they had seen him in person in a month, as the rules at the time said that family members could only enter if a loved one might be dying.
We met the son and his mother in the hallway to help them put on personal protective equipment. I spun the boy around like a surgeon in the operating room, tying the yellow gown tight behind his back. He had brought flowers to say thank you.
His mother was quiet, holding a small prayer book that we helped her slip into a bio-hazard bag. The boy put his arm around her, a tender protective gesture.
Together we all entered the room. I remember how I explained to them that the ulcers on my patient’s face were from lying on his chest, the tubes in his neck and groin were to remove his blood and run it through a lung bypass machine.
The son nodded, as if this information made things better. His mother prayed, and I told them that we would do everything we could.
After more than three months, my patient is finally home. He remembers nothing from the intensive care unit. When he first made it out of the hospital and to rehab, shocked to learn that April had turned to June and believing that he must have been in a catastrophic car accident, he had asked his wife about what happened.
She told him it was better not to know too much, and he took those words to heart. Now, his scars are fading, but he struggles to sleep at night, awakened by vivid nightmares of his childhood.
His son notes that he is more forgetful now. He takes inventory of the ways his body has changed. A patch of skin on his left thigh where he has lost sensation, an ache in his shoulders and chest, the tip of a finger blackened by lack of blood flow.
At rehab the doctors told him it might have to be amputated, but with time it looks like it might be saved.
There, in the clinic room, as I listen to the air moving in and out of my patient’s remarkably clear lungs, I remember how the nurses turned his head toward Mecca and bathed his body in holy water that his family dropped off in the hospital lobby when they thought he might die.
I remember how even from outside in the hallway, we could hear the religious music playing from an iPad inside the room. No matter how many times I return to these moments, I still don’t know what to make of it all.
His is a tremendous outcome, one of our very best successes, a survival we did not expect and still cannot fully explain. A father is back with his family. He will feel the pride of seeing his son start college, even if remotely.
But there is something bittersweet. His eyes are haunted, and he can’t sleep, and I have no idea how or when he can return to his work.
His son hears sirens passing by their home on the way to a nearby hospital, and it is as if it is all starting again. As much as I want to reassure them that things will be okay, I can’t make that kind of promise.
At the start of the pandemic, it was easy to see mortality as the only outcome that mattered. It is surely the simplest to measure. Nearly six months in, we still focus on coronavirus-related mortality as an indicator that things in this country are finally getting better.
But it is increasingly clear that mortality is not the full story – not for any of us. People want to be able to get back to their lives and to know what might be ahead.
Yet, there are still more questions than answers. We continue to learn about the long-term impacts of this virus. We don’t know the strength and duration of immunity, or even which therapies actually work to improve outcomes.
We don’t know how many of those who survive severe COVID-19 return to work, to what extent lungs heal, how often patients are readmitted, the burden of psychiatric disease and the long-term consequence of isolation.
We don’t know why my patient was the only one in his family to grow so sick and why he got better.
But what we do know – anecdotally from our own patients and from the studies that are emerging from countries whose surges predated ours – is that the medical manifestations and trauma of this virus persist and impact the quality of the lives that are saved.
We understand too that for those of our patients in disadvantaged groups, essential workers and those living in immigrant communities who were vulnerable to begin with, recognising and seeking care for these lingering issues will not be easy.
As much as we all want this to be over, it continues – even as the caseload falls. And our responsibility to our patients does not end when they leave our hospital doors.
As the clinic visit comes to a close, we make a plan moving forward – labs, breathing tests, an X-ray, a new primary care doctor and an appointment with a psychiatrist, all before he comes back to see us again.
My patient and his son seem satisfied, but as they ready to leave the office, I find my eyes starting to tear. I realise that part of me expected that seeing my patient again might offer me a sort of closure, but that is false.
After so much trauma and loss, a clinic visit can’t mark the neat end to this narrative. There is no simple conclusion or silver lining here, no return to normalcy for any of us.
But there is also this. My patient’s nephew is waiting to pick him up, in the exact spot where he parked the car the day that we called his family in for what might be goodbye.
They will return home to have dinner together. For months, the ground has been shifting beneath their feet and now, we all find ourselves in a place that is at once familiar and entirely new.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.